 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
When you retain Jack I. Hyatt, you will get the very best oportunity to get your case dismissed prior to trial. Jack I. Hyatt is a aggressive lawyer for drunk driving, speeding, radar and driving on a suspended license. He is a past assistant state's attorney, has gained experience is over 20,000 cases, thoroughly knows the state's play book and is able to use it to provide you with the best possible defense, get your case dismissed prior to trial and keep your license.
"Thanks for a job extremely well done in getting my DUI, negligent driving, and all 11 related charges dismissed prior to trial so I did not have to appear in court and also having my MVA hearing dismissed."~N.M. "I was nervous about my DUI charges from the day I was charged until the day you called several days prior to trial indicating all charges would be dismissed and I would not have to appear in court. Thanks again for suggesting I not accept the state's offer to plead guilty."~~R.F. "I selected Jack Hyatt because of his experience, knowledge and reputation. He thoroughly investigated my case, detected technical mistakes made during my arrest and had my DUI and all other charges completely dismissed at trial. If you are charged with DUI or any traffic charge, he is the lawyer you need to call."~~R.S. "I was extremely worried about my pending DUI charges due to two prior DUI convictions. Your aggressive representation was excellent in getting all DUI charges dismissed prior to trial. You seemed much more knowledgeable than my two prior attorneys and were always available to answer my questions."~~T.D. "Thanks again for your aggressive representation in getting my MVA hearing dismissed and saving my license. I am so glad I switched lawyers."~~F.F.
Implied ConsentUnder an implied consent law, any person who operates a motor vehicle in the state is deemed to have consented to a drunk driving chemical test. The implied consent law serves as a means for gathering evidence against a drunk driving defendant. Although the implied consent law is legal, it fails to mask the law’s foundational fallacy that a driver's presence on a state's highway indicates an agreement to submit to a chemical test for drugs or alcohol upon the lawful request of a police officer.
In most places, the implied consent warning is read to the suspect only if the offender refuses. After being read the warning statement, the offender is asked again. The offender and the police officer who read it must sign the form to acknowledge that the warning was read. At least one county court requires that the implied consent warning be read before asking the suspect to agree to the test. The law enforcement officers in that jurisdiction, as well as State troopers, read the implied consent form first as a matter of standard procedure. Some officers feel they would get fewer refusals by just asking. The language of the warning is about as simple and clear as a legal document can be. It emphasizes the license suspension penalties for refusing and advises that a second refusal is a crime.
|